Defending Zone Read and Power Read Concepts

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction:

marshall1If an offense is centered on 10 or 11 personnel groupings, chances are the spread option game is a vital component of its play menu. That play menu will most likely consist of the power read and zone read game. Regardless of what formation offenses will dress these schemes up in, defenses need to have a plan to defend them. The research below serves as “change-ups” in defending spread option concepts. Implementing them into your base plan can yield negative plays and perhaps even turnovers.

Issue: Defending the Zone Read Game

The zone read game has been a staple among spread offenses for years and it’s not going away any time soon. As offenses are finding various components – pre-snap movement, formation changes and blocking variations – to dress up these concepts, these items shouldn’t be of priority in defending them. The following techniques and stunts can provide for indecision at the quarterback spot, which can lead to negative plays and more importantly, turnovers.

Solution 1: “Chase” Stunt, TJ Gillen-Hall, Kilgore High School (TX)

With “first threat” as our base technique, we can add our adjustments from there. The first of these is called “chase” (Diagram 3). This is a basic scrape exchange between the end and play side linebacker. Through our weekly tendency break down, we decide which side we will do this to, the back or quarterback. This is based on if they are primarily a zone or power read team. Normally, this would be more of a zone read change up, so we usually have the end on the side of the back executing it. If he gets a down block, he will chase the down. In doing so, we have now given him the back. Our play side linebacker will then exchange with the end and he has the quarterback. If the 7 technique ends up with this stunt, he will no longer be reading the tight end. If he gets a down out of the tackle, he will chase the down and have the back. Against power read teams, this exchange would be executed by the end away from the back and it should give the QB a quick give read.

Solution 2: “Hit” Stunt, TJ Gillen-Hall, Kilgore High School (TX)

The final defensive line call we can make against read teams is called “hit”. This tells our end he is going to hit the quarterback no matter what. As mentioned before, we determine the end that will be running this based on tendency of the opponent. We could run it to the back, away from the back, to the strong or weak side end, or we’ve even had both sides run it if called. This is a read stunt so it only happens if the end gets a down block. They should know it doesn’t matter if it’s zone read, power read or any other variation, if he gets a down block he will head to the quarterback. Like chase, if the 7-technique is the end running it (the stunt) he would be in a tackle read instead of a tight end read pre-snap. We give the end an aiming point to stay at least half a man outside the quarterback, so it can be run outside in. In a perfect world, it will look like the end is up field like our rocket stunt; the quarterback will make the wrong read, and we will hit him for a big loss. Even if it doesn’t work out perfectly, we want the end to tackle the quarterback. We tell our kids the more we hit the quarterback in the read game, the more likely he’ll make a mistake and start guessing on his reads (Diagram 6).


Issue 2: Defending the Power Read Game

Since many defensive coaches group the zone read and power read concept together, we decided to present our research on these two concepts together. The “inverted veer” as some coaches refer to it, forces defenses to both out-leverage the ball carrier on the speed sweep, yet be sound enough in the box to handle the quarterback run. The following movements and techniques allow defenses to accomplish both these feats.

Read More

Mid Zone Scheme: 4 Techniques in Backside Blocking

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Editor’s Note: The following research was conducted as part of XandOLabs.com special report on Middle and Outside Zone concepts, which can be accessed in full by clicking here.

 

Introduction:

The backside of the stretch or middle zone concept is different than the inside zone concept, mainly because the scheme is not intended to cut behind the front side A gap like it is in inside zone. Therefore, it may be possible to “cutoff” the backside by getting defenders on the ground.  When we asked coaches what they preferred to do on the backside of wide zone concepts, 42.7 percent said they teach a rip to run technique, where 33.7 percent teach a full reach or scoop scheme backside.  Only 15.7 percent choose to cut block on the backside.  

chart23

We felt this could be due mainly to a large population of high school coaches who simply don’t spend enough time on the cut block technique because it is illegal in some states to do so.  Regardless of the technique on the back side, the visual aiming point was constant- 40.9 percent use the far number of next adjacent first level defender play side as a visual target. 

Rip to Run Technique

Jason Eck, the offensive line coach at the University of Minnesota State Mankato talks about a “fast track” technique on the backside of his wide zone concept.  “It’s deep open step and run and we’re looking to cut the defender in our play side gap,” said Eck.  “We never cut before 3rd step.  When climbing to the second level we run to green grass—where they are going to be—not where they are. The point is to get shoulders perpendicular to goal line at contact–Rip backside arm through play side leg. Get off the ground before the defender does.”

Read More

Zone Read “Choice” RPO

 

By Luke Mertens
Head Coach
Lakes Community High School (IL)
Twitter: @LakesFootball1

mertensIntroduction:

How many times have you seen an open window on the perimeter close instantly due to less-than-desired receiver blocking, despite dedicating an enormous amount of practice time on this exact skill? After cycling through a few receiver coaches and yelling at more than a few players, I have come to the realization that what receivers are asked to do in spread offenses is one of the toughest tasks in football. The solution was to take advantage of those reads by implementing RPOs into our offense. This allows us to now take advantage of perimeter defenders that are so well coached at reading run/pass cues.

Zone Read Choice

Every offense needs a “hat-hanger” and there’s no question that Inside Zone is ours. Over 80% of our run game called on Friday nights is Inside Zone. Like most spread teams, one of the looks we really like with Inside Zone is the Zone Read; however, we incorporate a pitch option for our QB more than most Zone Read teams.

After self-scouting, we came to realize that our Triple Option was predictable, which, combined with the difficulty of WR perimeter blocking, was not yielding the desired results. That said, we were also frustrated with the lack of productivity when we called Bubble. Since both of these concepts were central to our overall game plan, we knew we needed to make a change. The result was combining those two schemes into an RPO concept. We found that this change would both minimize our predictability and allow us to put those well-coached perimeter defenders in a bind.

Our Choice package tells our back side, perimeter players to execute Bubble while all box players and WRs to the play side to execute Inside Zone. It is then the QB’s job to put us in the best play based on both what he is seeing before and during the play.

The first thing he looks at is the pre-snap alignment of the defense. If he sees cushion and/or outside leverage by our WRs to the backside of the Inside Zone play call, then he knows he has the green light to throw the Bubble. Even if he makes this decision, he still must mesh with the RB to force the defense to honor the possibility of run. If the QB has any doubt on whether or not to throw the Bubble, we instruct him to give the ball. We feel that giving the ball to the RB is never a wrong decision and is a much safer alternative to possibly guessing wrong on Bubble.

Choice RPO Key Coaching Points:

  • QB pre-snap read – look for numbers and leverage on the back side to throw Bubble.
  • Even with a “green light” the QB does not have to take the Bubble.
  • Inside Zone is NEVER the wrong choice.
  • QB is to ALWAYS mesh with the RB.

If the defense disguises well and spins post snap into a look that is not conducive to running Bubble, then the QB should give the ball to the RB. This is another reason why we always have the QB/RB mesh regardless of the pre-snap read. Below is an example of a “green light” for the QB out of a 3×1 set:

Read More

2 Quarters Coverage Adjustments vs. 12 Personnel

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Editor’s Note: The following research was conducted in part of X&O Labs special report on Quarters coverage which can be accessed in full by clicking here.

 

Introduction

One of the knocks against using Quarters coverage structures is the vulnerability it may have in defending closed sets where deep safeties must be tied into the run game. While that fundamental can developed with constant coaching, we’ve found that using “Tight” and “Flats” coverage adjustments in quarters coverage can help alleviate what can potentially be problem areas in 12 personnel teams.

Ace Formation (Diagram 32)

The Ace Formation is a balanced set where there are two-wide receiver threats to each side of the formation. In traditional Quarters rules, it may be sensible to play a “Read” call to both sides of the formation in order to get those safeties activated in the run game. This makes sense. With eight potential gaps in the run game, those safeties are forced to become run players first – you’d be a gap short in the run game in a 4-3 front (only seven box defenders). But if you’re lining up against anybody with the ability of New England Patriots and their two tight ends (ok, maybe with a quarter of the ability of Gronkowski), then you’ll need to make sure those safeties can handle number two vertical stretching the field.

Read More

Pressures to Attack Full-Slide Protection

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikeKKuchar

Editor’s Note: The following research is part of X&O Labs’ special report on Developing a Pressure Check System, which can be found by clicking here.

 

Introduction

Full-Slide Protection (Diagram 70A): Full slide protection simply means the offensive line will slide all in one direction and put its back away from the slide. Here, the offensive line could slide in many directions, to the field, to the boundary, to the QB’s backside, etc. It’s important to get a tendency on where they are sliding most often based which could be based on down and distance and personnel.

Slide70a

Without question, full slide protection is the most simple to dissect and perhaps just as simple to attack. The key is to understand where they are setting their slide. Slides can be set to the back, away from the back, to the field or to the boundary. Once that tendency is determined, it becomes more sensible to attack away from the slide protection. We were surprised to hear that many defensive coaches are still seeing the majority of offenses employ full slide protection on a weekly basis. “We see so much slide protection in our league, everyone is doing it.” Butler Community College defensive coordinator Tim Schaffner told us. “We blitz the back to also work on the zone read.”

Read More

Addressing Pressures in P.A.P. Protections

By Brian White
Offensive Coordinator
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Twitter: @CoachWhite_RHIT

 

Introduction:

RHPAThe main goal of our offense is to be a great Inside Zone team. In order to be an effective running team, we must have a well-developed package of compliments to our run game. These include our Bubble Screens, Four Vertical package and our Play Action package, which is the focus of this article. Our Play Action package is simple to execute for all eleven players on offense, while adding a layer of complexity for the defense to defend. We have found our Play Action schemes to be effective against the run stopping defenses we see, such as Quarters, Cover 3 and Cover 1.

Protection:

All pass concepts start with great pass protection. Having the offensive line understand the launch point of the quarterback and the backfield action behind them is critical to the success of the protection. The offensive line does not need to know every detail about the pass concept and action. They only need to know enough to make them understand where and when the ball should be thrown. In the case of our Play Action concepts, the quarterback and running back will execute a hardball fake of our Inside Zone. The quarterback will then work to a depth of 9 yards deep behind the original alignment of the back side tackle (meaning the tackle away from the zone fake). The quarterback will either break contain or pull-up based on the block of the back side defensive end. We will detail this mechanic a little bit later in the article. Based on this information the offensive line must understand that our Play Action concepts involve a hard action fake and the quarterback is working away from the zone.

Slide1Slide2Slide3

The protection will start with the center identifying the Mike linebacker. The center will use the same Mike declaration as if we were running Inside Zone. This means the Mike will be the first Linebacker from head-up on the Center to the play side. The offensive line will block Inside Zone with covered/uncovered principles. The first uncovered offensive lineman is responsible to work in combination to the point. The adjustment we make when running Play Action protection is that all offensive linemen will block a play side number landmark, which is slightly different than on our Inside Zone. Knowing that the quarterback’s launch point is away from the call, the offensive line can be confident to keep their defensive lineman on the run to the call side. These are the rules we teach our Offensive line:

PST: Block the play side C gap defender with play side number landmark. Alert to block an edge rusher.

Footwork: Dependent on width of 5-technique. Use Bracer (drop, bucket, etc.) footwork against a tight shade technique and over up on the second step. Shuffle first to cover up a wide shade.

PSG: Block the play side B gap defender. Combo to the Point if uncovered.

Footwork: Covered footwork is the same as the PST. Use Jab-Vertical footwork against a 2i technique to strike his play side number using a Flipper or Single Under technique. Use Bracer footwork against a Shade technique and provide presence to the nose with back side arm.

C: Identify the Mike as the first LB head-up and to the play side. Block the play side A gap defender. Combo to the Mike if uncovered.

Footwork: Use a Bracer step against a play side shade technique or head-up nose. His second step must get to the crotch of his defender. Gallop in leading with the play side knee against a 2i technique. Use Bracer footwork and provide presence for the back side guard against a back side shade or 2i technique.

BSG: Block the back side A gap defender.

Footwork: Use Bracer footwork against a 2i technique. He must get his second step to the crotch of the defender. Utilize a Shuffle-Bracer step against a shade nose.

Read More

Defending Empty Routes: Mixing Halves and Quarters Coverage

By Pete DeWeese
Defensive Coordinator/LBs
Milton High School (GA)
Twitter: @petedeweese

 

Introduction

CaptureThe game has changed, and as a result, defensive coordinators at every level have been forced to reexamine the way they structure their defenses. Spread offenses have changed the landscape of college football. While many of the RPO schemes that offenses are starting to use seem cutting edge, the reality is that offensive coaches are going back to time-tested schemes and simply adapting how they apply them. Good offenses know there are four surefire ways to put stress on a defense:

  1. Have better athletes on the field.
  2. Create extra gaps for the defense to defend.
  3. Maximize the number of vertical threats in the passing game.
  4. Take players out of their comfort zone and attack them.

Perhaps no formation puts these four stressors on the field at the same time as well as Empty formations. These formations allow the premier playmaker on an offense to create mismatches that put him in space to make plays. Empty also maximizes the threat of vertical routes, and in doing so, can force box defenders out of their natural habitat. Though Empty formations do not explicitly create extra gaps around the tackle box, they can open up gaps if a defense responds by removing a typical box player, thus effectively creating the same issue for a defense.    

Defending Empty Formations

We run a 4-3 defense as our base with a nickel package that is rooted in a 3-4 structure as a change-up. Our defense is a one-gap scheme that relies heavily on our technique and on our recognition of formations, tendencies, and schemes while blitzing infrequently. We worked hard to make sure that we could find a solution to Empty that didn’t force us to stray too far from our the core concepts of our defense. What we found was that it is much more difficult to do than it is to say.

During the 2014 season, 11 of the 13 teams that we faced ran some form of Empty formation. Our staff has been looking for the best “answer” for empty formation for four seasons. During that time, I have met with a handful of well-respected, college-level defensive coordinators and surveyed many other coaches to find the best solution. In the end, he most common answer that I received was some version of “I don’t have one.”

One former ACC & BIG 10 defensive coordinator told us that his graduate assistants had completed an in-depth summer study on Empty for two consecutive off-seasons. As part of their research, they broke down every snap of Empty that they could get their hands on. They looked at both sides of the ball and tried to analyze both the offensive tendencies and the defensive schemes used to combat them. In the end, the research suggested that Empty is a different creature and must be handled as such. With that research as our guide, we have adopted a similar philosophy at Milton.

This may seem drastic, but the absence of a back and the possibility of 3×2 and 4×1 alignments really is a game changer. Take a Trips formation for example, a 3X1 set is a 3X1 set and most defensive structures allow for easy adjustments regardless of offensive alignment. Many teams will incorporate the same front, coverage, and pressure packages to a 3X1 set with an attached TE just as they would if that TE flexes out. In my opinion, Empty does not allow itself to be so cleanly adjusted to.

Since it is different, we start with a different set of questions. Here is a list of questions that we address when we are preparing for an Empty package we start by addressing the following questions:

  • Is the QB a run first threat?
  • Do they use a 5, 6, or 7 man surface along the LOS?
  • Are they primarily a 3X2 or 4X1 version of Empty?
  • Do they use motion in their Empty package?
  • Where do they want to go with the football?
  • How do they stretch the field within their Empty Package?

Once we are armed with the answer to these questions, we are ready to create a solution for our defense that can work against the Empty formations that we are going to see that week. In the following section of this report, I will address some ways of defending multiple Empty concepts and schemes.

Defending 3X2 Empty

The most traditional 10P Empty formation typically aligns receivers in a 3X2 distribution. 

Read More

Drills to Block First Level Twists in Pass Pro

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Editor’s Note: The following research was part of X&O Labs special report on Man Pass Protection Drills. The full-length version of this special report is in our Insiders membership website. You can join the Insiders by clicking here.

 

Introduction:

wmuWhile many of the techniques in the special report can be applied when blocking stagnant or stationary targets, the greater issue in pass protection is coaching players on how to defend movement, particularly at the first level.

This report is devoted to the techniques and drill work associated with defending E/T and T/E games, zone pressures and man pressures in pass protection. We researched not only how offensive line coaches are teaching their players to identify pressure, but more importantly, how to block it when it does come. Before we delve into the techniques these coaches use and the drill work that corresponds with it, a brief background on who our contributors are:

The Contributors (in alphabetical order):

  • Chennis Berry (CB), Offensive Line Coach, Southern University (8 sacks allowed in 2014, 4th in FCS).
  • Brian Callahan (BC), Offensive Line Coach, Western Michigan University,
  • Vin Giacalone (VG), Offensive Line Coach, Valparaiso University (5 sacks allowed in 2014, 1st in FCS).
  • Herb Hand (HH), Offensive Line Coach, Penn State University.
  • Art Kehoe (AK), Offensive Line Coach, the University of Miami (allowed 1.6 sacks per game in 2014).
  • Brandon Jones (BJ), former Offensive Line Coach at East Carolina University (371 passing yards per game in 2014, 3rd in FBS), currently at Cal Berkeley.
  • Jonathan Leibel (JL), Offensive Line Coach, Central Connecticut State University (11 sacks allowed in 2014, 10th in FCS).
  • Cameron Norcross (CN), Offensive Line Coach, Fresno State University.
  • Ryan Stancheck (RS), Offensive Line Coach, Alcorn State University (7 sacks allowed in 2014, 3rd in FCS).
  • John Strollo (JS), Offensive Line Coach, Ball State University (13 sacks allowed in 2014, 12th in FBS).

Single Man Twist Drill: Southern University

Read More

The Shovel/Bubble Triple Option RPO

By James Stubkjaer

Offensive Line Coach

SF Roosevelt High School (SD)

Introduction

Like many RPO concepts, this play started out as a simple Power Shovel play. But when our head coach decided to married the bubble play the power shovel it really began to take off for us. This is one of a few RPO plays that we employ, where we will put defensive players in conflict and take what the defense gives us based on a combination of pre-snap/post-snap reads. This, of course, requires our quarterback to process information and make decisions on the fly, but gives him multiple options for this one play.       

Linemen Alignment

As part of our spread concept, we put an emphasis on spreading out the box players as well. Our offensive linemen are in a two-point stance with wide splits that could range anywhere from 2’ to 4’ depending on the play. I know that some people believe that having linemen in two-point stance hurts the physicality in the run game, but that would be contrary to my experience. In the five years that we have used this technique, we have averaged over 31 points per game, over 200 rushing yards game rushing, and a minimum of 5.4 yards per carry.

We also want our level off of the ball to be as far back as legally possible. The levels off the ball are the key for the linemen in this offense because it allows them time to use their technique and make their blocks. The rule in South Dakota is that the facemask of the offensive lineman must break the plane of the centers hip. Once our center is set in his stance, the guard will adjust his splits accordingly, and we like to have our guards place the toe of their inside foot, so that it would touch an imaginary line drawn parallel to the heels of the center. Our tackles, then line up their inside foot, so that it would be parallel to the toe of the inside foot of the guard. If you view our formations from the side, you will see the center out and the guards/tackles will be in a straight line, as far back off of the center as we can get.                 

As a general rule, we are a gap-man blocking team but we often couple those concepts with inside zone rules on the back side. We lean heavily on the skip pull technique for our pullers but we also use open pull techniques at times.

Power Shovel / Bubble Concept:

Here in South Dakota, we predominantly see 4-3 and 3-4 fronts and the occasional 30-stack defense. We have found that this concept can work against any of these looks with a few formation changes. Here is a look at this concept against each of these common fronts:

Power Shovel Combo v. 4-3

Slide1

Play Side Tackle: Double the 3-technique to the Mike. Note: We will squash his split down to about 2′ for the double.

Play Side Guard: Double the 3-technique to Mike with the tackle and keep eyes on the 2nd level for an A gap blitzer.

Center: Pin or base block 1-technique. Note: We also can pull our C, depending on back side ability and location of the back side nose guard.

BG: Skip pull, staying tight to the double team, and climbing to the Sam backer. It is critical that he does not pass up work on the way to the backer so if he encounters any resistance he will stay on that man.

Read More

Lock/Master Lock Concept to Negate Gap Exchanges

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Editor’s Note: The following research was conducted in part of a larger special report on the Pistol option game, which can be accessed by clicking here.

Gap Exchange/Reading Second Level Players

bildeOne of the more common defensive adjustments to zone read teams is known as a gap exchange, the most common being a first level and second level defender. According to Cameron Norcross, the former offensive line coach at the University of Nevada, these were the most common counters defenses would have against zone read concepts. Many defenses would tighten the alignment of their defensive ends to allow them to squeeze down blocks while second level linebackers can scrape over the top to play the QB (Diagram 16). Norcross recounts a time that Nevada encountered this exact problem when playing Boston College in a bowl game a couple years back. “We could never get our tackle down to block the play side inside linebacker,” said Norcross. “So we told the tackle to block him so our slip guy could block the play side inside linebacker (Diagram 17). The alley player would be free. So we ran our arc scheme to the tight end side so we didn’t need to run the ball at the tackle. We basically man schemed the back side (read side) of the play. Our tackle was responsible for him so we can take our tight end/wing back on the alley player.

Read More

Tight End Flat Combinations to Complement Zone/Bubble

By Curt Fitzpatrick
Head Football Coach
Morrisville State College
Twitter: @_CoachFitz

 

Introduction:

Fitz SidelineLike many up-tempo offenses, a large percentage of our run game at Morrisville State is based around running the Inside Zone play successfully. In spread formations, we either utilize a bubble screen on the back side to create a triple option look to the defense or give the QB a “now” throw if the bubble has the defense outflanked based on pre-snap alignment or pressure. This is a staple of our offense because it allows us to attack the entire field from sideline to sideline with one play call. We want to give our QB options, and try to have answers for multiple looks that a defense could give us on any given snap. 

Last season, inside zone made up 42% of our total run calls and we averaged 6.3 yards per play over those 196 plays. Below was our ball distribution on the play:

  1. Give to RB – 68% (5.4 yds/carry)
  2. QB Keep – 14% (8.9 yds/carry)
  3. “Pitch” Phase – 14% (8.7 yds/play)
  4. Front Side Alley Control – 4% (4.8 yds/play)

Because we run this play as a triple option, the “pitch” phase is whatever the third option is for the QB.  In many cases this is a bubble screen, but at times we will use a tight end flat route to the back side. This is a nice complement when a bubble screen is not available due to the lack of a slot receiver. This allowed us to utilize the same teaching that we spent so much time on when installing the zone bubble concept with a slot wide receiver and made it easier to install for our players as we try to use as many “this is just like that” install scenarios as possible. Furthermore, because of the way that teams line up to surfaces with a tight end, it gave us some opportunities for our quarterback to get some safe, high percentage completions. 

The key to making this concept work is that we were causing defenders to be in conflict in alignments that they may have not been exposed to previously. For example, a Sam LB might be more familiar with defending a zone bubble look when he’s apexed between the #2 receiver and the end man on the line of scrimmage (EMLOS) as opposed to inside the box against a tight end surface. After all, a goal of any up-tempo offense is to make defenders hesitant and question their eye discipline. This scheme fits that goal perfectly. 

Read More

Press Box Research Report

By Mike Kuchar

Senior Research Manager

X&O Labs

 

pressbox

Introduction

Now that we’re all approaching mid-season form, we felt imperative to address perhaps what might be the most under-coached aspect of on field coaching decisions- press box communications.  We’ve all been in situations when our spotter in the booth is caught “watching the game,” and not what he’s supposed to be clued in on.  Training your spotters is a difficult task, one that can only be mastered with the combination of disciplined eye training and plenty of experience. 

XandOLabs.com sent its survey on press box communications to 3,900 coaches- only offensive coordinators, defensive coordinators and head coaches at all levels that reported back on the methodology they use in the press box.  We heard back from coaches who had worked with their spotters for over twenty years and some who were in the process of training a beginner up there.  We’re more than happy to report on our findings below.

Case 1- Personnel in Press Box

Before we begin with the most common protocol used in the booth, we wanted to present some findings that we found interesting on the personnel in the booth.  We wanted to start with the head coaching position and find out how many coaches are tied into game day communications.   It seemed like the visual of the stoic head coach, ala Tom Laundry, pacing the sidelines without a head set is lost in football lore.  Truth is, we found that 83.6 percent of head coaches wear a head set on game day.   This wasn’t so shocking.  But there are some- like the University of Michigan’s head coach Brady Hoke, that choose not to do so.  It was this sixteen percent that we felt we needed to explore.  We reached out to the small minority to find out what those head coaches are doing when not on a headset and here is what we found:

“I go between the coordinators when suggesting things or asking questions, but only when I deem it a necessity.”- David Bice, Sardis High School (AL)

“An assistant with a headset stands near me and passes information to and from the press box.”- Joe Fabrizio, head coach, St. Petersburg High School (FL)

We found that those head coaches that opt not for the headsets are naturally not coordinators.  They spend the majority of the game delegating responsibilities- such as personnel, calling offenses and defenses- to their assistants.  Some of these coaches choose also not to be on the phones in order to eliminate clutter, which can be a constant distraction during the course of the game.  We found that the majority of coaches, 58.6 percent, use more than five headsets on game days.  This is more than double the amount that use up to five (see survey results below)Considering the majority of our survey responders where high school and mid-major college coaches, we found this number to be particularly high.  The protocol these coaches use during the game will be discussed in further cases, but the fact that there can be that many “mouths” going during the course of the game is staggering.  Managing that communication can be a chore.  What we found even more interesting is that even though many programs are using more than five headsets, 37.5 percent of these coaches have only two total coaches in the press box.  Now the issue becomes how to delegate responsibility to those two coaches, which we will explore now in futher detail. 

chart4 

Case 2- Offensive Responsibilities and Communication Protocol

The first question we wanted to explore regarding the offensive side of the ball was how many offensive coordinators are in the booth as opposed to being on the field.  We found that 63 percent of offensive coordinators choose to be on the field, which is significantly lower than defensive coordinators on the field.  We know that most coordinators choose to see the “big picture”- fronts, coverage’s, movements, etc. which is particularly why many major college programs have its offensive coordinators in the booth.  But as far as high school and small college coaches are concerned, the majority chooses to be on the field and trust their spotters up top to do their jobs.   Despite having a possibility of five coaches on headsets, 48 percent of these coaches only allow up to two other coaches talking on the headsets at the same time. 

Multiple Spotter Protocols

Having two spotters in the booth can provide some benefits to the offensive coordinator.  While we all know elements like down and distance, field position and coverage can be important, 37.3 percent of coaches feel that the defensive front is the most valuable information offensive coordinators receive from their spotters in the booth (see survey results below).    One of those coaches is Doug Taracuk, the offensive coordinator at Dublin Scioto High School (OH) who relies more on the visual he gets on the defensive front, more specifically, the defensive ends.   “The defensive ends are important to us due to our use of misdirection plays such as nakeds, counters, and reverses,” Taracuk told us.  “The play of the end often dictates what types of pass protection we use, which screens we use, and which reads or options we use. We want to know his angle of attack, his feet, how often he comes under pass sets, how disciplined is he on plays away, and does he wrong arm kick out blocks.  In our area, the big difference between great teams and average teams is often dictated by the play of the field or formation defensive end. With the variety of offenses in our area, we may not see how an end will play against our style on our scout tapes.”

chart9

Taracuk detailed and example of this below:

“On Tape one, our opponent played a Navy style option team. Our second tape showed our opponent playing against a four or five wide attack.  In game one, they played a two tight end double wing offense.  We had a decent clue of the scheme, but it was hard to evaluate positions.  Going into the game, we thought we could kick the ends out with our tight end.  We were wrong. We switched to our counter plays where we either kicked him out with a pulling guard or high walled him with out tackle.”   While one of his spotters is checking the defensive ends, Taracuk watches the front at the point of attack on runs and the under coverage on passes. The second spotter watches the secondary fills on runs and the deep coverage on passes.  Recently in Ohio, high school programs are allowing coaches to use technology up in the press box and as a result, Taracuk uses what he calls his “doodle chart,” which we made available to our Insider members (click here to download this form)“We shoot pictures or video each play with an I-Pad.  At the end of each series, we tally the fronts, coverage’s and stunts and draw in the fills or drops. From tha

Read More

Using Quick Game Tags to Attack Voided Alleys

By Scott Girolmo 

Offensive Coordinator and Assistant Head Coach

Liberty High School (VA)

Twitter: @CoachSGirolmo

Introduction:

Liberty Handley Walters HUGGINS-320x246T.U.G. stands for “Throw to the Uncovered Guy,” and is a way for us to attack a perimeter weakness displayed in the defense as a result of poor alignments or over adjustment to stop our run game.

“T.U.G.” is used in our offense to any twin or trips receiver set that is back side of a perimeter run play, or that is to either side of any interior run play. “T.U.G.” has provided our offense with two quick pass options and successful plays with minimal risk. The first is a classic bubble route by the #2 receiver with a lead block by #1. The second is the opposite, a quick step back by #1 and a lead block by the #2 receiver. Our “Lookie” concept involves tagging quick pass routes on our run game to take advantage of match ups in man coverage or loose zone defensive alignment.

Identification of the “Coverage Triangle”

When we teach our receivers about coverage during spring install, the first topic we focus on is reading the “coverage triangle” to their side of the field. The coverage triangle refers to the spatial relationship between the deep safety player, corner and alley or primary force player on your side of the field (Diagrams 1 and 2).

We use this teaching method in all of our pass route concepts, and more often in our “T.U.G.” concept. For our conversion routes, it indicates to our receivers what adjustments to make pre-snap, and for our “T.U.G.” concept it will help them decide where the ball is going.

In the “T.U.G.” “concept specifically, we designate our outside receiver as the “shot-caller,” to dictate which of the screens we will be running and communicate that verbally to our slot. We only currently tag “Lookie” to a solo receiver, so it is up to the lone “X” to decipher the defense and relay his thoughts to the QB. The first step in reading his coverage triangle is to identify the deep safety to his side, and determine if he is a 1 high, 2 high, or no deep safety based on his relationship to the hash mark. Next, we determine if the technique of the corner is man or zone (inside or outside leverage) by assessing whether he is rolled up tight or backed off soft-aligned. Finally, locate the invert or alley player to your side who is most likely the primary force defender.

Slide1Slide2

Coverage Triangle Indicators:

The alignment of the triangle to your side will be the best indicator of overall coverage the majority of snaps. The situations that we practice against are condensed to provide the least amount of thinking possible for our players. Here are the concepts we expect our players to identify and understand:

Cover 2: If the safety is 10 or more yards deep and two yards outside the hash, we consider him to be a deep half player. The corner is tight and the alley player is splitting the slot’s alignment (Diagram 3).

Read More

Get Game Stats and Play-Charting in Real-Time and on the Sidelines

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction

LegUP Report Image

If you’re like 99% of us, you’re tracking game day stats and charting plays with pen and paper. This process hasn’t changed much since football coaches began collecting and analyzing data decades ago. The problem with this method is its time consuming, cumbersome and doesn’t always produce the most accurate data – which can cause major problems when you’re making critical decisions based on “kinda-sorta” accurate information.

This is why I’m excited to bring you this report. We’ve been testing a new technology that will completely change the way you look at play charting and stat tracking forever.

I’m talking about LegUP (www.LegUPAnalytics.com), the new iPad application that replaces the old pen and paper system of charting statistics and plays. LegUP tracks the play, the situation, the players involved and how they contributed to the outcome, and where and how the play ended.

At first glance, we thought LegUP was just a better mouse trap over the pen and paper method, but we were wrong… really wrong.

After testing the application for the last two weeks, we’re confident that LegUP is ushering in a new era of performance analytics. As coaches, we feel that LegUP has changed the process of play charting and stat tracking in two innovative ways…

  1. Real-Time Analysis: What we like best is that the stat tracking and play charting data is available in real-time. That means coaches on your staff will have access to the information on the sideline during games using LegUP’s iPad app (no internet required) – so you’ll no longer have to meet with your staff at halftime to “sync” up on stats. With LegUP, your coaching staff will have access to your opponent’s tendencies and trends during games, as well as your own tendencies and trends.
  2. Post-Game Reporting: As soon as the game is over, LegUP uploads the data to your team’s account (which is accessible from any computer with internet access). Using your LegUP account, you’ll run through a quick procedure to ensure all data from the game is accurate and ready for advanced reporting. Once this post-game work flow is complete, you can send play charting and stat reports to the coaches on your staff. You can also send injury reports to the athletic trainer as well as coaches. And best of all, you can easily upload data directly to HUDL. Keep in mind, this can all be done immediately after the game is complete, giving you more time to review your team’s performance.

Why We Like LegUP Analytics:

Read More

Easy “Layups” with the RB Stack Concept

By Andrew Coverdale

Offensive Coordinator

Trinity High School (KY)

Twitter:  @andrewcoverdale

Introduction:

“Inbounds plays” in basketball are used for two specific reasons. First, it is used to get an easy layup or clean shot for a shooter by their design. Secondly, they are used to get the team into their regular offense. We have taken that same concept and applied it to the football field to give us some “easy layups” that can easily transition us into our base offense.

Stack Formations:

When we signal for a “stacked” alignment by the RB and a run is part of the play call, we are using the RB’s “stacked” alignment as the football equivalent of an inbounds play. We can run this to either the boundary or the field and with or without some other kind of restraint.

In our system, “stack” tells the RB to:

  1. Align directly behind the widest receiver if told to stack into the boundary
  2. Align directly behind the first detached receiver (middle of 3) if to the field

Slide1Slide2Slide3Slide4Slide5

The “easy layup” we’re looking to get from the stacked alignment before ‘getting into our regular offense’ is one of our “Now” screens. For us, that means “Raider” if the RB is to the boundary or “Saint” if he is to the field.

Slide6Slide7

Mechanics:

Step 1: Upon seeing the signal/before going to align, the RB says to the QB, “stack-stack-stack” to remind him to assess the ‘inbounds play’ before running the normal play, and as a reminder to sink him into the backfield if he sees a dirty slot. 

Read More